Comments on: Knol : The Wikipedia Competitor from Google is now open to Public http://www.earnblogger.com/knol-the-wikipedia-competitor-from-google-is-now-open-to-public/ A Blog about Blogging, Make Money Online and Social Media Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:10:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: kikamz http://www.earnblogger.com/knol-the-wikipedia-competitor-from-google-is-now-open-to-public/#comment-424 kikamz Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:17:26 +0000 http://www.earnblogger.com/knol-the-wikipedia-competitor-from-google-is-now-open-to-public/#comment-424 i guess that with Knol, an author's content will be protected. but the question is, "is the author writing a certain knol qualified to write it in the first place?" i mean, if anybody can just write a knol, then how does google verify whether the information is true or not? this is just me, thinking out loud. :D i guess that with Knol, an author’s content will be protected. but the question is, “is the author writing a certain knol qualified to write it in the first place?” i mean, if anybody can just write a knol, then how does google verify whether the information is true or not? this is just me, thinking out loud. :D

]]> By: EarnBlogger http://www.earnblogger.com/knol-the-wikipedia-competitor-from-google-is-now-open-to-public/#comment-423 EarnBlogger Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:11:46 +0000 http://www.earnblogger.com/knol-the-wikipedia-competitor-from-google-is-now-open-to-public/#comment-423 I Review You, You are right. They are targeting those people who loves to show off their names! Thanks for your comment. I Review You,
You are right. They are targeting those people who loves to show off their names! Thanks for your comment.

]]> By: I Review You http://www.earnblogger.com/knol-the-wikipedia-competitor-from-google-is-now-open-to-public/#comment-418 I Review You Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:24:29 +0000 http://www.earnblogger.com/knol-the-wikipedia-competitor-from-google-is-now-open-to-public/#comment-418 It seems that they want to attack on Wikipedia's soft spot: who's behind the article? I don't have issues with that, since most articles (the important ones) are debated and a neutral (or semi-neutral) point is chosen. As much as freeing knowledge, you can count me in! It seems that they want to attack on Wikipedia’s soft spot: who’s behind the article? I don’t have issues with that, since most articles (the important ones) are debated and a neutral (or semi-neutral) point is chosen.

As much as freeing knowledge, you can count me in!

]]>